Feedback

Once I had completed the rough cuts of my magazine I was given feedback from the rest of the class. I got some interesting and very helpful advice.

Here is a list of what my peers liked about my front cover.

• Photo works well with style.
• The background.
• The clear title.
• The main image.
• The fact that the image went over the title.

Here is a list of what my peers didn’t like about my front cover.

• Too many colours.
• Not enough text.
• Too many colours in colour scheme.
• No price.
• No date.

Here is a list of what my peers liked about my contents page.

• Images work well with the background.
• Good layout.
• Good use of different camera angles.
• Attractive font and page numbers.
• Good use of a quote.

Here is a list of what my peers didn’t like about my contents page.

• Too empty, more photos needed.
• Pictures don’t match description, brown haired girl as Hayley Williams?
• To much free space.

Here is a list of what my peers liked about my double-page spread.

• Writing stands out well.
• Good layout.
• Good image.
• Good use of subheadings.
• Good use of magazine posters in background.
• Well positioned title.

Here is a list of what my peers didn’t like about my double-page spread.

• Questions are too big.
• No page number.
• Too much free space.

I will take all of this feedback into account when creating the final draft of my music magazine. I will make the improvements needed judging by this feedback and keep the good strong attributes that my magazine already possesses.